Write About Now

new to you friday–it takes a forest…..

Happy Earth Day to you, a day late. I dare you to top the comments in the original post. (“We are important to the creation of the earth and our improvements cannot be seen, if we are to approach the question Biblically, as inherently evil.” “I fail to see how a Wal-mart on every corner and a McMansion every 32 feet is an ‘improvement.’”)

P.S. The issue of whether “global warming” is really happening is a related but separate issue from the broader question of our charge to care for the earth. And the presence of snow this winter does not, in itself, invalidate the possibility of climate change. Treat yourself to that rant here.
———————————————————————————–

A small sign at the San Diego Zoo informs visitors of a horrifying statistic: each week, it takes an entire forest of trees to supply the paper just for the Sunday newspapers in America. I used to buy the paper each Sunday for a quick scan of the front page, the TV guide, the Target ad, and the comics. I rarely recycled it. I need to change both habits.

I’ve been puzzled for years how Christians can justify intense, vocal involvement in some issues (abortion, gay rights) and not others like the environment. Although God created the earth, called it very good, and charged humans with its care, the protection and conservation of natural resources is seen as a “liberal” issue. (And of course no good Christian is a liberal.)

So I read with interest an article in the latest issue of Fast Company magazine about two pastors— Richard Cizik and Jim Ball—who also co-lead the Evangelical Climate Initiative. In February, the two leaders began the ECI by holding a press conference to share the biblical foundation for the program and to ask for tougher environmental laws. (Cizik is also a lobbyist for the National Association of Evangelicals, or NAE.) Fast Company reports that 86 evangelical leaders, including Rick Warren and several college presidents, pledged their support.

However, others did not—most notably Stuart Shepard, an editor and spokesman at Focus on the Family. “There are certain issues that define what it means to be an evangelical,” he says. “Global warming doesn’t fit into that.” Focus and 20 other groups pressured the NAE to remove Cizik after the announcement of the initiative.

I find this staggering, and disturbing.

Apparently, some in the religious right feel the inclusion of these concerns weakens the political impact of their position on abortion, homosexuality, and other “moral” issues. Yet the April 3 Time reported the huge potential consequences of disregarding the damage we’re causing. Cizik points out that 20 to 30 million people could be victims of these catastrophes—flooding, hurricanes, drought, and more. Many of those affected will be the poorest of the poor, and many of them will not yet be Christians—how does concern about these people not qualify as a moral issue? Every church I know donated money and organized volunteer teams to help the victims of Hurricane Katrina—is it somehow less “Christian” to work toward preventing the next round?

Natural disasters happened before global warming, of course. But even if no human being ever suffered from our treatment of the planet, Genesis 1 still reminds us we are called to be careful stewards of the world God created.

Cizik says, “Reducing pollution is loving your neighbor.” If evangelicals feel compelled to participate in politics, I wish our worldview could be truly global—broader than just a few hot-button issues, and concerned with the globe itself.

April 23, 2010 Posted by | opinions, people | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

a global warming rant

If I hear one more comment about global warming I am going to scream.

The real issue is climate change, and the current weather craziness could just as easily be proof of it as it could be proof against it. I don’t know and you don’t either because there is evidence both ways. But I know this—”global warming” doesn’t mean you never feel cold.

And I’m tired of it being a political issue instead of a scientific debate.

And I’m tired of the Christian/conservative kneejerk dismissal of it. (For the record, I’m tired of those on the other side, too.) Why is the prospect that we might actually be harming our world so threatening to these groups? No one’s blaming them for it.

That is all. (Although you can read more here.)

February 15, 2010 Posted by | opinions | , | 8 Comments

things I don’t understand, part 2

250px-eating_comp_21aug2005Eating contests.

Kenny Chesney’s appeal.

Why Americans are threatened by the idea of universal health care.

Why Christians are threatened by the idea of global warming.

Eating milk chocolate when you could eat the dark stuff.

The phrase, usually used during church announcement times, “We would ask you to……bring a casserole to the potluck/remember those Campbell’s soup labels/reserve your Golden Heirs Branson tickets/keep praying about Darlene’s polyps.” If you would ask, just ask.

“Customer service” 800 numbers requiring you to input your account number……only to have a live person ask you for it again when they finally come on the line.

Naming one’s children so that introductions sound like an ad for a law firm: “These are my kids Auten, Channing and Chamberlin.”

Cigarettes made with 100% organic tobacco.

Churches still failing to grasp that a group named “Pairs and Spares” will not attract many “spares.”

The people who live in warm climates and brag about it when they call you in winter, as if they had anything to do with the weather.

How I always get in front of the one person in the theater who feels compelled to offer an ongoing commentary about the movie.

The apparent brain-melting difficulty of actually matching congregational singing with the Powerpoint graphics containing the words.

Buying expensive toilet paper.

How Louie, an 8-pound runt of a cat, somehow maneuvers me to the very edge of the mattress each night.

Why Christians had to create “GodTube” instead of just putting their stuff on YouTube where people in need of God might actually see it.

The intermittent spraying of vegetables at the grocery store. Do people really believe the broccoli is fresher if it’s also dripping wet and impossible to get in a flimsy plastic bag?

Watching reality TV. My life has enough reality.

(Click here for part 1.)

March 30, 2009 Posted by | life, lists, opinions, things I don't understand | , , , , , , | 4 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.