<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: deep thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 20:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: happy blogiversery &#171; Write About Now</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[happy blogiversery &#171; Write About Now]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] we saved &#8216;em. How do we disciple [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we saved &#8216;em. How do we disciple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monvee &#171; Write About Now</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monvee &#171; Write About Now]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I recently blogged about the issues involved in encouraging and &#8220;measuring&#8221; discipleship in the local [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recently blogged about the issues involved in encouraging and &#8220;measuring&#8221; discipleship in the local [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think so Jennifer.  Other factors I would use to measure a relationship include (but are not limited to): the length of the relationship, the personal knowledge we have of each other, the influence they have on my life, my desire to go to that person when I am in need, and the amount of time I spend with them.  I&#039;m sure there are more.  

You are right; I would not want to personally disciple the entirety of even my small congregation.  There are some that I am incapable of mentoring (because they disciple me), and there are some that others are more qualified to mentor (because of gender, age, spiritual gifts, or life-circumstance issues).  Still, I have no problem personally overseeing the spiritual lives of a small and diverse group of people.  

When I used the word &quot;ministers&quot; I used it in the broadest sense - not just staff, but including all of the servant-leaders of the church.  I believe all church leaders (staff, elders, deacons/ministry-team-leaders, etc.) should be involved in helping people follow Christ.  

If those “ministers” are mature and qualified to mentor others – great.  If not, then I have a job to do.  That is why I always come back to the responsibility of the leadership.  If the buck doesn’t stop here, then where does it stop?  Look at me, being verbose again.  It is just that you hit on a topic that I speak about regularly and recreationally with my best friend.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think so Jennifer.  Other factors I would use to measure a relationship include (but are not limited to): the length of the relationship, the personal knowledge we have of each other, the influence they have on my life, my desire to go to that person when I am in need, and the amount of time I spend with them.  I&#8217;m sure there are more.  </p>
<p>You are right; I would not want to personally disciple the entirety of even my small congregation.  There are some that I am incapable of mentoring (because they disciple me), and there are some that others are more qualified to mentor (because of gender, age, spiritual gifts, or life-circumstance issues).  Still, I have no problem personally overseeing the spiritual lives of a small and diverse group of people.  </p>
<p>When I used the word &#8220;ministers&#8221; I used it in the broadest sense &#8211; not just staff, but including all of the servant-leaders of the church.  I believe all church leaders (staff, elders, deacons/ministry-team-leaders, etc.) should be involved in helping people follow Christ.  </p>
<p>If those “ministers” are mature and qualified to mentor others – great.  If not, then I have a job to do.  That is why I always come back to the responsibility of the leadership.  If the buck doesn’t stop here, then where does it stop?  Look at me, being verbose again.  It is just that you hit on a topic that I speak about regularly and recreationally with my best friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the discussion, and even the (kind) disagreement. Whether we&#039;re talking about Jesus, Paul, or even Moses, I keep coming back to the &quot;discipleship delegation&quot; inherent in each scenario. Jesus equipped his disciples to go and disciple others; the early church leaders chose seven others to entrust with responsibilities, leading to a time when &quot;the number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly&quot; (Acts 6:7); Moses chose people to help him after his father-in-law pointed out the light.

So I&#039;m not sure it has to be an either/or. Matt, I agree that our leaders have responsibility from God to model discipleship corporately and one on one--and probably could be doing a better job at it. But there&#039;s simply no way they can get to everyone, and in the &quot;priesthood of all believers&quot; we hold so dear, we wouldn&#039;t want them to, would we? That truly would lead to a hierarchy.

On the measurement issue, I feel connected to my friends and family if we&#039;re talking often and about substantial things, if we spend some amount of time together in person, if we are free of conflict (either from having worked through it or not having it in the first place), that kind of thing. So if I&#039;m talking regularly to God about the big and small stuff, spending time with him, and working through conflicts (because of my own sinfulness)--is that the metric?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the discussion, and even the (kind) disagreement. Whether we&#8217;re talking about Jesus, Paul, or even Moses, I keep coming back to the &#8220;discipleship delegation&#8221; inherent in each scenario. Jesus equipped his disciples to go and disciple others; the early church leaders chose seven others to entrust with responsibilities, leading to a time when &#8220;the number of disciples in Jerusalem increased rapidly&#8221; (Acts 6:7); Moses chose people to help him after his father-in-law pointed out the light.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m not sure it has to be an either/or. Matt, I agree that our leaders have responsibility from God to model discipleship corporately and one on one&#8211;and probably could be doing a better job at it. But there&#8217;s simply no way they can get to everyone, and in the &#8220;priesthood of all believers&#8221; we hold so dear, we wouldn&#8217;t want them to, would we? That truly would lead to a hierarchy.</p>
<p>On the measurement issue, I feel connected to my friends and family if we&#8217;re talking often and about substantial things, if we spend some amount of time together in person, if we are free of conflict (either from having worked through it or not having it in the first place), that kind of thing. So if I&#8217;m talking regularly to God about the big and small stuff, spending time with him, and working through conflicts (because of my own sinfulness)&#8211;is that the metric?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if we attempted to measure the growth and quality of a friendship, marriage, or other family relationship?  How would we do that?  If we could answer those questions, then I think we could apply them to our relationship with God.  I feel like I have been verbose on this issue already, so I&#039;ll just throw the question out there.  Maybe Jennifer or Kevin have some thoughts about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if we attempted to measure the growth and quality of a friendship, marriage, or other family relationship?  How would we do that?  If we could answer those questions, then I think we could apply them to our relationship with God.  I feel like I have been verbose on this issue already, so I&#8217;ll just throw the question out there.  Maybe Jennifer or Kevin have some thoughts about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph myers</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joseph myers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[another meandering...

What about us enjoys programmed development for spiritual formation and at the same time distains these programs? 

Maybe it’s our love/hate relationship with accomplishment. Programmed based growth patterns allow an organization (and sometimes individuals) to measure accomplishments that match the missional goals of the organization.  And thus, allows us to feel successful…or not.

One problem may be that we are at the same time “sickened” by the prospect that our relationship with Christ is based on accomplishment (e.g. if we know the answers to the Bible quiz). It seems to me that the best relationships are not based on accomplishment but on developing a sense of connection, belonging, community, hope, and…most of all presence.

What if we began to measure our spiritual formation by presence? Are we present with God today…this moment? What if it’s about living whole? Living with a mixture of life that embraces being alive and enchanted with what we would normally separate in dualistic ways.

What if everything we do…everything we are…forms our spirituality in a relational way with the Christ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another meandering&#8230;</p>
<p>What about us enjoys programmed development for spiritual formation and at the same time distains these programs? </p>
<p>Maybe it’s our love/hate relationship with accomplishment. Programmed based growth patterns allow an organization (and sometimes individuals) to measure accomplishments that match the missional goals of the organization.  And thus, allows us to feel successful…or not.</p>
<p>One problem may be that we are at the same time “sickened” by the prospect that our relationship with Christ is based on accomplishment (e.g. if we know the answers to the Bible quiz). It seems to me that the best relationships are not based on accomplishment but on developing a sense of connection, belonging, community, hope, and…most of all presence.</p>
<p>What if we began to measure our spiritual formation by presence? Are we present with God today…this moment? What if it’s about living whole? Living with a mixture of life that embraces being alive and enchanted with what we would normally separate in dualistic ways.</p>
<p>What if everything we do…everything we are…forms our spirituality in a relational way with the Christ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as we are disagreeing (kindly), then I disagree with the leap of logic that infers my statement about leadership, when applied to Moses, concludes that he was a failure.  Moses was a great example of the kind of personal and relational discipleship I believe in.  One has to look no further than the book of Joshua to see how effective Moses was in his legacy.  Before that, the Israelites followed him for forty years of wandering.  He must have been an incredible leader.  A little grumbling doesn’t negate that.  

I hope I am mistaken when my cynical side detects a bit of disdain for the “hierarchy of leaders.”  Church leadership is ordained by God.  It is a practical way that God dispenses grace to the Church.  Let me put my previous statement another way.  If 90% of the class is flunking, then the teacher needs to rethink his/her strategy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as we are disagreeing (kindly), then I disagree with the leap of logic that infers my statement about leadership, when applied to Moses, concludes that he was a failure.  Moses was a great example of the kind of personal and relational discipleship I believe in.  One has to look no further than the book of Joshua to see how effective Moses was in his legacy.  Before that, the Israelites followed him for forty years of wandering.  He must have been an incredible leader.  A little grumbling doesn’t negate that.  </p>
<p>I hope I am mistaken when my cynical side detects a bit of disdain for the “hierarchy of leaders.”  Church leadership is ordained by God.  It is a practical way that God dispenses grace to the Church.  Let me put my previous statement another way.  If 90% of the class is flunking, then the teacher needs to rethink his/her strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joseph myers</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joseph myers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if we were to change our emphasis of spiritual formation from diving deeper into our walk with Christ to walking daily? 

Relationships meander through seasons. Some of those season cannot be described as deep  but they are a significant part of the journey. We mostly accept this and journey with others through all kinds of seasonal relational change.

What if it were the same with our walk with Christ? What if we measured daily instead of deeper? 

I’m not proposing that deeper is bad. But I am wondering if we would take the pressure off the experience with Christ becoming more and more deep maybe we would naturally and organically walk daily and sometimes find ourselves deeper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if we were to change our emphasis of spiritual formation from diving deeper into our walk with Christ to walking daily? </p>
<p>Relationships meander through seasons. Some of those season cannot be described as deep  but they are a significant part of the journey. We mostly accept this and journey with others through all kinds of seasonal relational change.</p>
<p>What if it were the same with our walk with Christ? What if we measured daily instead of deeper? </p>
<p>I’m not proposing that deeper is bad. But I am wondering if we would take the pressure off the experience with Christ becoming more and more deep maybe we would naturally and organically walk daily and sometimes find ourselves deeper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jana</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me, you&#039;ve caught me at a time when I have just completed a 72 hour experience with other Christian seekers. I think the transformational experience and knowledge of God&#039;s love and His ways (that we experienced  together at a Walk to Emmaus) is the first step for individuals to experience the thankfulness and THEN have the energy to pass the Good News on - that, I think, is the energy that runs the engine of the church fellowship. And I disagree (kindly) with Matt about leadership (although they can encourage the flock - but was Moses a failure because the Israelites grumbled for 40 yrs?)...I saw the body being energized this weekend, and not a hierarchy of leaders. If only 10% of church populations are actively involved (a statistic I&#039;ve heard)and are the &quot;worker bees&quot;, then the rest of the body needs to be energized and renewed. But the trick is the timing - Emmaus believes that each person comes when they are ready to address their need. So, would it be that the leadership highlights the need, the &quot;starvation&quot; that is going on and offer these opportunities to the body? Hmmmm...thanks so much for the trail of thoughts!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, you&#8217;ve caught me at a time when I have just completed a 72 hour experience with other Christian seekers. I think the transformational experience and knowledge of God&#8217;s love and His ways (that we experienced  together at a Walk to Emmaus) is the first step for individuals to experience the thankfulness and THEN have the energy to pass the Good News on &#8211; that, I think, is the energy that runs the engine of the church fellowship. And I disagree (kindly) with Matt about leadership (although they can encourage the flock &#8211; but was Moses a failure because the Israelites grumbled for 40 yrs?)&#8230;I saw the body being energized this weekend, and not a hierarchy of leaders. If only 10% of church populations are actively involved (a statistic I&#8217;ve heard)and are the &#8220;worker bees&#8221;, then the rest of the body needs to be energized and renewed. But the trick is the timing &#8211; Emmaus believes that each person comes when they are ready to address their need. So, would it be that the leadership highlights the need, the &#8220;starvation&#8221; that is going on and offer these opportunities to the body? Hmmmm&#8230;thanks so much for the trail of thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/2008/10/27/deep-thoughts/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writeaboutnowjt.wordpress.com/?p=884#comment-463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If relational and organic were the ways of the early church, then why must we complicate things?  I know large churches that have the same staff to attendance ratio as my small congregation but they say they cannot personally care for and mentor their congregations.  Why not?  What in the world are we doing if we are not personally helping people follow Christ?  I do not mean to pick on large congregations (they just happen to be the biggest target); small churches have the same problems.  

What if all ministers, regardless of their title or area of specialty, constantly made disciples as Jesus did?  Of course this would require all ministers to possess enough spiritually maturity to disciple as Jesus did.  Is this perhaps part of the problem?  (Ouch.)  I am a firm believer that if the team is not winning, then you change the coaching situation.  If our people are not growing then perhaps we need to look at our leadership and ask some difficult questions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If relational and organic were the ways of the early church, then why must we complicate things?  I know large churches that have the same staff to attendance ratio as my small congregation but they say they cannot personally care for and mentor their congregations.  Why not?  What in the world are we doing if we are not personally helping people follow Christ?  I do not mean to pick on large congregations (they just happen to be the biggest target); small churches have the same problems.  </p>
<p>What if all ministers, regardless of their title or area of specialty, constantly made disciples as Jesus did?  Of course this would require all ministers to possess enough spiritually maturity to disciple as Jesus did.  Is this perhaps part of the problem?  (Ouch.)  I am a firm believer that if the team is not winning, then you change the coaching situation.  If our people are not growing then perhaps we need to look at our leadership and ask some difficult questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

