Write About Now

When I moved to California and began looking for a church, I had three criteria: a) sound doctrine, b) authentic worship (regardless of “style”), and c) a service in which I didn’t look at my watch during the sermon.

I found a wonderful church with a great senior minister. He preaches each week with energy and power and somehow connects with non-, new-, and mature believers all at the same time. He’s funny and creative and also actually a good guy.

So this post is not targeted at my current church or any church in particular; it’s just to comment on that fact that—despite everything I wrote above—most Sundays I fight the temptation to leave the service before the sermon. Most Sundays I don’t, because I value the church and want to obey the Bible’s teaching that we should gather together, but most Sundays it’s difficult.

I find it interesting that for all of our focus on being “culturally relevant,” we still think a 30 minute sermon is the way to connect. (Or, out here, closer to 40 minutes. Californians like to think they’re hipper and more in touch than the Bible Belt, but California preachers speak longer than any ministers I listened to in Ohio.)

You could argue that I just have the attention span of a three year old, and I am a member of the generation raised on MTV and 30-second commercials. But I think there’s more to it than age.

In his book Emerging Worship, Dan Kimball develops a persuasive argument (based not only on his read of our increasingly postmodern culture but also on Scripture) that the weekend worship service should not be the primary focus of our programming and planning, and the sermon should not be the biggest element of the service. Instead of long messages, he suggests shorter teaching segments interspersed with reading chunks of Scripture (now there’s an idea!), prayer and reflection on what’s been taught, and worshipful response through singing, giving tithes and offerings, taking communion, journaling, and more.

What I love about the book is that Kimball, and some others who champion this type of service, do so not to be trendy or cutting-edge or generally squirrelly. It’s not about making a statement, it’s about weekend worship as an intentional outgrowth of a broader theology of church.

So maybe I’m longing for more substance, or maybe I’m just young and impatient. Either way, I spend most Sunday mornings doodling through a sermon. Or, like today, drafting something for my blog on the back of the bulletin.

December 4, 2006 - Posted by | people, the church | , , , , ,

2 Comments »

  1. Thoughtful post here Jen, I like it. I’m a preacher like the the one you describe…that is, I try to keep it interesting and relevant. And, unlike the Californians, I try to keep it to 22 minutes.

    Anyway, I’ve been rethinking so many things, worship in particular. Your comments are especially timely for me. Have you read “Blue Like Jazz”?

    The church where I serve needs to start a couple of new services off-site so this might be good timing (God-timing?) in more ways than one. I’ll pick up Dan Kimball’s book and see just how much more confused I can get!

    Keep up the good work. Your writing is refreshing.

    Comment by Steve Jones | December 5, 2006 | Reply

  2. [...] we simply over-elevated the importance of one weekly service (and our expectations of it)? Dan Kimball’s books remind us we’ve made weekly worship the entrance point for seekers and the “if you do nothing [...]

    Pingback by church fatigue, part 2 « Write About Now | August 24, 2010 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

Please log in to WordPress.com to post a comment to your blog.

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.